that-husmant
speaking
he would
416
have drawn after Service) + $/1152
вайся
is
is
years
more
$768
His pension is to bem the same proportion to 768 as 20 does to 36
it should be 4426-66
and a
ore
le 407 26 little men de
437#
^
Mr. Lucas
No.2.
it will work out.
a
follows: Salary: #866:
Age 46 years. Salary, &
Service
actual, 24
24:33:
ye
ورة
X
60
60
26:23:54.7.2
1x = $347·96
8647
342
Service at 5$ yes; 33 years.
X
864
i
full rate offension
Less ten percent, his pension will be $358.16
which, on the above suppositions, is all he cauget.
The case of Chan Shan, worked out No. 4.
the above lives:
Азе
Service
ނ
Age 43
Cheung Ho -
years. Salary
$300
average,
Service -actual,
18
Service at $$
jes;
30 yes.
(is. at 55yu), 30
By
by
which
Salary $832.66
maxiMAA
represents the Pension towhich he is entitled; the
37 years.
actual 12 years;
12:30: x:
30
(00 + 등) x
832-66
Let x
No.3.
60
12:30 x 485.72
x
$194.25
And that should be the Pension
not as
case are
}
awarded him
grain in the despatch, #235.92
The mumites on
세
Leung
Kwai Kai's
Caffected as fallstion whether
But if it is g part that the case is covered by fury of the desfal
sentitled to Pansion at all.
13327
and (2) that his pension should be reduced 10
years.
the terms of our despatch No. 1) (an 183),
(and not, as mough stated in
Save
munite of that on 3327) he was awarated a pension, it was decided that he shouldbegiven "the full rate of pension towhich "his &
hein a claim (see fans 2, 3. "length of service of that desfatch). The case, therefore, is
not affected by the despatch on 382), which merely confirmed the decision begranthin Jension
par. 3. The pension, therefore,
remains
ascal culated?
No.5. Ng Yung
No. 6. If Trung
ki.
same as No & above.
the Excott's & M. Luce? See minutes, A.
E
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.